Indeed, I wrote to R. Marks about my concerns regarding the Horizontal No Free Lunch theorem. And I sent the links to my blog entries. And these blog entries are critical of his work. But what is the problem?
- my blogging could be totally unsubstantiated. In this case he really should ignore it - for any valid theory, you'll find thousands of idiots blogging about imagined problems.
- my entries could be well-thought through, but ridiculously wrong. In this case, I made a fool out of myself in public- and he could criticize me for doing so.
- there maybe something true in my blog entries: if these grains of truth aren't buried in filthy language, insults, etc., why should they be ignored?
I just don't get it.