tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1689592451067041352.post5464187765129484783..comments2023-05-08T07:41:01.071-07:00Comments on DiEbLog: What is wrong with public debate?DiEbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02099109109735165335noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1689592451067041352.post-9172245700780212192010-09-03T06:11:36.435-07:002010-09-03T06:11:36.435-07:00Marks has caught on to the fact that you're a ...Marks has caught on to the fact that you're a really sharp guy. His response to you is a fancy rendition of W. C. Fields' "Go away, kid, you bug me."<br /><br />Some journals routinely open threads online for discussion of articles they publish. I think this should be universal practice. You and I would be posting in such threads for the articles of Dembski and Marks if they existed. They don't, and we post where we can.<br /><br />As you previously pointed out, Dembski did not allow comments even in the censorial Uncommon Descent environment. Perhaps the "Isaac Newton of Information Theory," intellectual leader of the Forces of God in the cultural war, cannot possibly admit to his acolytes that he's made yet another elementary error in his mathematics.Tom Englishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01588057273889552197noreply@blogger.com